State v. Webb
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 4862
Syllabus
FELONY SENTENCING; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); R.C. 2929.11; R.C. 2929.12; R.C. 2921.331(C)(5)(b); CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES; R.C. 2929.14(C)(3). The defendant-appellant's sentence is not contrary to law because it is within the sentencing range and the trial court properly considered R.C. 2929.11, 2929.12, and 2921.331(C)(5)(b). The defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not contrary to law because consecutive sentences are mandatory under R.C. 2929.14(C)(3) since the defendant-appellant was convicted of a felony violation of R.C. 2921.331.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. DorseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-15· cited 137×
- State v. NobleOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 88×
- State v. CollierOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-09· cited 87×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-13· cited 80×
- State v. McKennellyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-18· cited 22×
- State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-10· cited 18×
- State v. WestOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-14· cited 11×
- State v. ClaninOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-25· cited 7×
- State v. WingateOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-21· cited 6×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-27· cited 5×
- State v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.