Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/11/2024
State v. Spangler
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 883
Syllabus
Crim.R. 11 Ability to Pay Mandatory Fine. Defendant-appellant did not demonstrate that his plea was anything other than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The trial court properly considered defendant-appellant's present and future ability to pay before assessing a mandatory fine.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court· 2006-05-03· cited 217×
- State v. StoneOhio Supreme Court· 1975-07-16· cited 134×
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-17· cited 45×
- State v. FabianOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-03· cited 29×
- State v. WilkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-17· cited 11×
- State v. WestOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-14· cited 11×
- State v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-07-27· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.