State v. West

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 1611

Syllabus

Appellant's guilty pleas were knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. The trial court did not completely fail to comply with Crim.R.11(C)(a)(2), and the record does not demonstrate prejudice. The trial court correctly informed appellant that he was subject to five years of post-release control. Ineffective assistance is not demonstrated in defense counsel's alleged failure to advise appellant to enter pleas of no contest in order to appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress the record does not reflect what advice defense counsel gave to appellant prior to his pleas, and the court advised him that a guilty plea was a complete admission of guilt which waived his right to appeal any pretrial rulings. Analysis of whether the sentence imposed was clearly and convincingly not supported by the record under R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12 is precluded. Judgment affirmed.