Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/1/2017

State v. Wertz

Citations

2017 Ohio 8766
89 N.E.3d 667

Syllabus

The trial court erred when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress. The encounter between the officer and the appellant was not consensual in nature, and appellant's constitutional rights were accordingly implicated. Judgment reversed and remanded for further proceedings. (Welbaum, J., dissenting.)

Judges: Donovan, Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Ivery
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-28· cited 3×
State v. Sandifur
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-25· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Terry v. Ohio
Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
United States v. Mendenhall
Supreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
State v. Burnside
Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
State v. Fanning
Ohio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
State v. Carter
Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 1,439×
Smith v. Ohio
Supreme Court· 1990-03-20· cited 207×
United States v. McMurray
Sixth Circuit· 2011-08-04· cited 105×
State v. Strozier
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2007-08-31· cited 68×
State v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-22· cited 65×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-09-13· cited 44×
United States v. Frank D. Matthews
Sixth Circuit· 2002-01-10· cited 34×
In re D.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-10-09· cited 18×
State v. Blankenship
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-14· cited 7×
State v. Garrison
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-24· cited 6×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.