Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/13/2025

State v. Wells

Citations

2025 Ohio 839

Syllabus

Nunc pro tunc; denial; resentencing; postrelease control; Tier III; sex offender; jurisdiction; presumption of regularity; sentencing entry. Trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's request for a nunc pro tunc order of a sentencing entry when nothing in the record indicated that there was an error or omission in the sentencing entry that required correction through a nunc pro tunc order.

Judges: Forbes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
State v. Wells
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-10· cited 13×
State v. Blevins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-30· cited 3×
State v. Williams
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-30· cited 3×
State v. Emanuel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-26· cited 2×
State v. Walker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-05· cited 2×
State v. Thompson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-17· cited 2×
Max, Inc. v. Mughal
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-08· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.