Skip to main content

State v. Thompson

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 5011

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a nunc pro tunc entry because defendant sought a substantive legal change to the underlying decision, and a court may only issue a nunc pro tunc decision to correct a clerical mistake. Additionally, res judicata barred appellate review of the substantive legal change defendant sought as defendant could have raised the issue on direct appeal.

Judges: Jamison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.