Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2/7/2018

State v. Banes

Citations

910 N.W.2d 634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that for statements to be admissible as showing responsive conduct, they must be relevant to some aspect of proponent’s case
noting that when out-of-court statement is offered, not to show the truth of the matter asserted but to explain responsive conduct, it is not viewed as hearsay
holding failure to object to the instruction makes it the law of the case for purposes of the review of the record on sufficiency of the evidence
concluding a series of commercial burglaries committed over a period of a few days “was not a series of related predicates over ‘a substantial period of time’” (citation omitted)
finding that the State had not established a continued threat of future criminal conduct, where the unemployed defendant committed several commercial burglaries over a period of a few days but did not testify about any future plans to commit crimes
noting uncontested jury instructions become the law of the case for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaitheswaran, Potterfield, McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.