Skip to main content

State v. Weaver

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2256

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress his statements to state agents and evidence of his possession of a firearm following an administrative inspection of a club at which appellant was providing security services. The encounter was consensual, and the firearm was in plain view. Even if a brief detention occurred, the investigating agents had reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. Appellant's conviction for having weapons under disability was supported by sufficient evidence of his prior conviction of a felony offense of violence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hanseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.