Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/11/1979

State v. Warren

Citations

604 P.2d 660
124 Ariz. 396
1979 Ariz. App. LEXIS 686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding no reversible error in presentence report that contained “numerous references to crimes that the defendant was either never charged with or to charges in which he ha[d] been acquitted”
When a court allows inadmissible evidence, we will “assume, unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary, that the [court] only considered the competent evidence in arriving at the final judgment.”
even where inadmissible evidence is admitted, we will “assume, unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary, that the [superior court] judge only considered the competent evidence in arriving at the final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ogg, Jacobson, Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.