Special Pros. of NY v. United States Atty. for SDNY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, “[s]ince Ableman and Tarble, there has been no serious challenge to the principle that state courts possess no power to remove a person from the jurisdiction of federal courts or agencies by writ of habeas corpus”
• finding that “[s]ince Ableman and Tarble, there has been no serious challenge to the principle that state courts possess no power to remove a person from the jurisdiction of federal courts or agencies by writ of habeas corpus”
• state court cannot issue compulsory process to secure the presence for testimonial purposes of witness in federal \custody\ under witness protection program
• “[T]he court which first assumes control over the subject matter of litigation — be it persons or property — shall retain exclusive jurisdiction over it until it has exhausted its remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).