Skip to main content

State v. Ward

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1605

Syllabus

Newly discovered evidence does not warrant a new trial where someone else was charged with committing the same offense around the same time but the circumstances of the offenses were different and it is unlikely that the victim misidentified the assailant where a victim was adjudged mentally incompetent after testifying but there is no evidence that the victim had mental health problems at time of the testimony or based on evidence that could have been obtained at the time of trial and the issue could have been raised on direct appeal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Copy at State Court Record, ECF No. 5, Ex. 42

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: M. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.