Skip to main content

State v. Walton

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1963

Syllabus

Anders nonfrivolous issue guilty plea consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) plea agreement breach R.C. 2929.12 due process juvenile adjudication. An independent review of the record reveals that there are no nonfrivolous issues to argue in this case involving appellant's guilty plea or the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences. The prosecutor's statements during the sentencing hearing did not constitute a breach of the parties' plea agreement. The trial court did not err or violate appellant's due process rights by considering appellant's juvenile record during the sentencing hearing.

Judges: Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.