State v. Brown
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1059
Syllabus
Anders brief; lack of meritorious grounds for appeal; wholly frivolous; motion to withdraw; dismiss the appeal; plea made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily; Crim.R. 11(C)(2); remand; nunc pro tunc; clerical error. Motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), granted where there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. Case remanded for the trial court to issue nunc pro tunc judgment entries that reflect the offenses to which the defendant-appellant pleaded guilty and the sentences imposed.
Judges: Klatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-05· cited 24×
- State v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 8×
- State v. WoodallOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-28· cited 6×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-10· cited 6×
- State v. HolbertOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-13· cited 5×
- State v. GarrisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-30· cited 4×
- State v. CorboOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-21· cited 2×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.