State v. Gilbreath
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 642
Syllabus
Pursuant to R.C. 2929.12(D)(2) and (3), the trial court was permitted to consider defendant's extensive juvenile record and apparent lack of rehabilitation when it imposed the maximum sentence for a conviction for a felony of the second degree. The Ohio Supreme Court's holding in State v. Hand, 149 Ohio St.3d 94, 2016-Ohio-5504, 73 N.E.3d 448, does not bar the trial court from considering a defendant's juvenile record when imposing a sentence within the applicable statutory range. The sentence imposed by the trial court is not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Hand (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-25· cited 110×
- State v. CochranOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-20· cited 24×
- State v. TerrelOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-09· cited 16×
- State v. FolkOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-06· cited 12×
- State v. BromagenOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-07· cited 11×
- State v. CarneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-17· cited 8×
- State v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 8×
- State v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-21· cited 7×
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-30· cited 6×
- State v. VanderhorstOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-07· cited 4×
- State v. WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.