Skip to main content

State v. Wall

Citations

  • 343 N.W.2d 22
  • 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the presence of mitigating factors does “not obligate the court to place [a] defendant on probation”
  • noting that the presence of mitigating factors “[does] not obligate the court to place defendant on probation or impose a shorter term than the presumptive term”
  • holding that mitigating factors do not require departure
  • “The fact that a mitigating factor was clearly present did not obligate the court to place defendant on probation or impose a shorter term than the presumptive term.”
  • “The fact that a mitigating factor was clearly present did not obligate the court to place defendant on probation or impose a shorter term than the presumptive term.”
  • “the mere fact that a mitigating factor is present in a particular case does not obligate the court to . . . impose a shorter term than the presumptive term”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amdahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.