Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 12/9/2003
State v. Martinson
Citations
- 671 N.W.2d 887
- 2003 Minn. App. LEXIS 1445
- 2003 WL 22889579
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming a downward durational departure when record contained “uncontroverted [evidence] that, at all relevant times, [appellant] suffered from the psychosis of paranoid schizophrenia.”
- affirming a downward durational departure for a defendant who suffered from paranoid schizophrenia and concluding that his mental impairment was sufficiently extreme to be a substantial and compelling circumstance that justified the departure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willis, Toussaint, Shumaker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-07· cited 267×
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-15· cited 82×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-03· cited 82×
- State v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-20· cited 63×
- State v. GellerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-24· cited 53×
- State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-10-28· cited 24×
- State v. BarsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-07-09· cited 9×
- State v. ColeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-04-16· cited 7×
- State v. Sanchez-SanchezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-12-10· cited 3×
- State v. BaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-11-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.