Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 8/5/1986
State v. Staten
Citations
- 390 N.W.2d 914
- 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that employment factors should not be used as reasons for departure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randall, Popovich, Leslie, Parker, Crippen, Nierengarten, Lansing, Huspeni
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-15· cited 82×
- State v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-20· cited 63×
- State v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-11-08· cited 28×
- State v. CizlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-04-17· cited 20×
- United States v. BergmanS.D. New York· 1976-06-17· cited 17×
- State v. EsparzaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-05-14· cited 11×
- State v. MalinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-14· cited 10×
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-02-18· cited 9×
- State v. BiederstedtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-30· cited 4×
- State v. RittCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-03-19· cited 4×
- State v. NevinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-11· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.