Skip to main content

State v. Walker

Citations

  • 923 So. 2d 1262
  • 2006 WL 778648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the State’s general objection was sufficient where “it is clear from the hearing transcript that the trial court was aware of the legal errors associated with its ruling”
  • noting that the law does not require futile acts to preserve error for review
  • noting that the law does not require futile acts to preserve error for review
  • “Following the trial court’s pronouncement of sentence, the State levied a general objection stating, ‘[a]nd, Your Honor, for the record, the State would object to the downward departure.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.