District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/4/1999
State v. Bray
Citations
- 738 So. 2d 962
- 1999 WL 538111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant's custody of and need to support his daughter was not valid basis for downward departure
- holding that the fact that a defendant had a child to support did not support a downward departure
- neither the fact that the crimes committed were non-violent nor that the defendant needed to support a family member were valid reasons to support downward departure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salcines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StephensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-11· cited 27×
- State v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-29· cited 15×
- State v. BrannumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02· cited 14×
- State v. GeoghaganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-31· cited 13×
- State v. ClayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-02· cited 13×
- Rafferty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-01· cited 12×
- State v. ChapmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-19· cited 8×
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-01· cited 7×
- State v. McKnightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-21· cited 6×
- State v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-22· cited 5×
- State v. GraysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-09· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.