Skip to main content

State v. Waldschmidt

Citations

  • 740 P.2d 617
  • 12 Kan. App. 2d 284
  • 1987 Kan. App. LEXIS 1144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Fourth Amendment search had occurred when officer climbed neighbor’s barbed wire fence to see over defendant’s stockade fence into curtilage, balanced himself against fence and placed both his arm and flashlight over fence
  • noting curtilage is entitled to a higher degree of Fourth Amendment protection but is not free from all warrantless searches
  • noting curtilage is entitled to a high degree of Fourth Amendment protection but is not free from all warrantless searches
  • emphasizing yard was enclosed by fence when holding area within the curtilage
  • emphasizing yard was enclosed by fence when holding area within the curtilage
  • yard was immediately adjacent to house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Clement, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.