Court of Appeals of Kansas· 12/13/1991

State v. Tinsley

Citations

823 P.2d 205
16 Kan. App. 2d 287
1991 Kan. App. LEXIS 1047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding area not within curtilage when defendant failed to show he was utilizing the area in question
stating existence of a property right is only one element in determining whether expectations of privacy are legitimate
commenting on lack of fence or other enclosure surrounding the home when holding area outside curtilage
commenting on lack of fence or other enclosure surrounding the home when holding area outside curtilage
stating existence of a property right is only one element in determining whether expectations of privacy are legitimate
bam and catde shed “could often be presumed to be used in the ‘intimate activity’ of a rural farm home”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rulon, Davis, Buchele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.