State v. Waggoner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is readily apparent that the legislature intended to make traffic complaints effective even though a person defending against one might have to make some reasonable inquiry * * * in order to know exactly what offense is charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Carpenter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-06-20· cited 10×
• State v. Atkinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-28· cited 10×
• State v. Sagner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-08-26· cited 9×
• City of Oakland v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-08-22· cited 4×
• State v. Barnhardt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-04-18· cited 4×
• Swisse v. City of Sheridan
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1977-03-21· cited 4×
• State v. Vance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-07-27· cited 4×
• State v. Clapper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-05· cited 4×
• State v. Hoffman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-22· cited 3×
• State v. Rush
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-07-02· cited 2×
• State v. Denue
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-09-09· cited 2×
• State v. Shervey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-06-01· cited 1×
• State v. Strop
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-12-05· cited 1×
• State v. Land
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-01-29
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-06-01