State v. Sagner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel’s “pure. conjecture” of officer’s suspected disciplinary problems was insufficient to warrant production
• holding that counsel’s “pure conjecture” of officer’s suspected disciplinary problems was insufficient to warrant production
• whether the information exists is purely conjecture
• whether the information exists is purely conjecture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Blackwell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 260×
• State v. Kaszubinski
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-12-01· cited 22×
• Ex Parte State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-06-29· cited 10×
• State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Schwartz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-08-02· cited 9×
• Milstead v. Smith
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-07-27· cited 9×
• Milstead v. Johnson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-07-27· cited 9×
• State v. Wixom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 9×
• State v. Christopher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-01-25· cited 2×
• State v. Utley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-04-05

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Avent
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1956-10-27· cited 62×
• State v. Jim
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-04-02· cited 52×
• State v. Sagner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-02-20· cited 48×
• Hanson v. Cupp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-05-06· cited 36×
• State v. Fleischman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-03-30· cited 31×
• State v. Waggoner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-09-27· cited 19×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-04-02· cited 2×