· 6/19/2018
State v. Barnhardt
Citations
- 918 N.W.2d 76
- 2018 WI 90
- 383 Wis. 2d 144
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the decision whether or not to impose sanctions is a matter for the court’s discretion”
- explaining that even if a claim violates Rule 11, a court need not impose sanctions
- “[T]he decision whether or not to impose sanctions is a matter for the court's discretion.”
- “The decision whether to impose a sanction for a Rule 11(b) violation is . . . committed to the district court’s discretion.”
- “The decision whether to impose a sanction for a Rule 11(b) violation is . . . committed to the district court’s discretion.”
- “Even if the district court concludes that the assertion of a given claim violates Rule 11 ... the decision whether or not to impose sanctions is a matter for the court’s discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.