Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 10/31/2012

State v. Vinson

Citations

400 S.C. 347
734 S.E.2d 182
2012 S.C. App. LEXIS 327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

referring to Whren and indicating an officer’s subjective motivations play no role in search and seizure analysis
referring to Whren and indicating an officer’s subjective motivations play no role in search and seizure analysis
affirming the circuit court's ruling that an officer was justified in stopping a driver for a perceived violation of section 56-5- 1900 of the South Carolina Code (2006
\Reasonableness is measured in objective terms by examining the totality of the circumstances.\ (quoting Pichardo, 367 S.C. at 101, 623 S.E.2d at 849)
\The plain language of section 56-5-1900 requires a driver to maintain his vehicle 'entirely within a single lane' and excuses this mandate only when it is not practicable or the driver can safely change lanes.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockemy, Thomas, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.