State v. Hake
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4622
Syllabus
Trial court did not violate defendant's right to counsel of his choice when it appointed counsel for the defendant at a status of defense counsel conference during which the defendant appeared without having retained a new counsel. At a plea hearing, State's promise to dismiss a count of passing bad checks if the defendant paid restitution to the victim by the date of sentencing was not illusory because the trial court advised the defendant during the plea hearing that it could sentence him that day.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,863×
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 1,843×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 804×
- State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
- State v. AponteOhio Court of Appeals· 2001-08-30· cited 5×
- State v. BowlingOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-30· cited 3×
- State v. VentersOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-02· cited 3×
- State v. JosephOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-18· cited 1×
- State v. BussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.