Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/23/2017
State v. Vega
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 651
Syllabus
Motion to suppress. Trial court's granting defendant's motion to suppress odorless hard candy containing THC affirmed when police officer was looking for raw marijuana because of the strong odor of raw marijuana in defendant's vehicle.
Judges: Blackmon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-04-21· cited 2,086×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- United States v. JohnsSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 515×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 370×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2009-12-15· cited 136×
- State v. WelchOhio Supreme Court· 1985-07-03· cited 84×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dwan Bernard Gill, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 2002-02-06· cited 57×
- United States v. RamirezTenth Circuit· 2003-09-08· cited 21×
- Burton v. Estate of DavisIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-06-27· cited 10×
- State v. GreeneOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-11· cited 9×
- State v. McGeeOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-18· cited 8×
- State v. MowlerOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-06· cited 3×
- State v. FogelOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.