Tenth Circuit· 9/8/2003
United States v. Ramirez
Citations
- 342 F.3d 1210
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18547
- 2003 WL 22073278
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where investigators have acted with reasonable diligence, courts have found acceptable the detention of mail for anywhere from twenty-nine hours to five days.”
- “However, certain packages may be detained for investigative purposes when the authorities have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.”
- “However, certain packages may be detained for investigative purposes when the authorities have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.”
- ”We will not require investigators to cease an otherwise reasonable investigation solely because a dog fails to alert, particularly when we have refused to require that a dog sniff test be conducted at all.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Kelly, Shadur
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Kevin Davis (03-1451) and Keith Presley (03-1621)Sixth Circuit· 2005-11-22· cited 234×
- United States v. Munoz-NavaTenth Circuit· 2008-05-06· cited 162×
- United States v. Todd John Lakoskey, United States of America v. Thomas James LakoskeyEighth Circuit· 2006-09-14· cited 68×
- State v. Steven Clay AndersonIdaho Supreme Court· 2012-09-14· cited 43×
- United States v. Quoc Viet HoangNinth Circuit· 2007-05-14· cited 38×
- United States v. Cesar GonzalezEighth Circuit· 2015-03-23· cited 25×
- United States v. JonesFirst Circuit· 2012-12-05· cited 20×
- United States v. BroadwayD. Colorado· 2008-02-25· cited 17×
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-01-28· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-25· cited 11×
- United States v. Jesus Villafranco-ElizondoFifth Circuit· 2018-07-27· cited 11×
- State v. VegaOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 3×
- State v. Steven Clay AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-04-28
- United States v. PresleySixth Circuit· 2005-11-22
- United States v. Todd John LakoskeyEighth Circuit· 2006-09-14
- United States v. HoangNinth Circuit· 2007-05-14
- People v. EmersonNew York Supreme Court· 2003-09-30
- United States v. BeasleyD. Kansas· 2016-04-13
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. Van LeeuwenSupreme Court· 1970-04-27· cited 399×
- United States v. Adela Morales-Zamora, United States of America v. Javier Ozuna-Fuentes and Jose Manuel Morales-DiazTenth Circuit· 1990-09-06· cited 147×
- United States v. Darrell Jay Glover, United States of America v. Susan Noreen KozakTenth Circuit· 1997-01-24· cited 117×
- United States v. Laurena Ann LuxTenth Circuit· 1990-06-08· cited 80×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dwan Bernard Gill, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 2002-02-06· cited 57×
- United States v. Ibukun O. MayomiSeventh Circuit· 1989-05-01· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.