State v. Vaughn

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 307

Syllabus

The trial court did not err when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress as it related to the creation and administration of the photospreads used to identify him as the perpetrator of a bank robbery. The trial court did not err when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the search warrant. The trial court did not err when it permitted a forensic scientist to testify as an expert in the field of materials composition/comparison. Appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a limiting jury instruction pursuant to R.C. 2933.83(C)(3) because no evidence of noncompliance with the requirements of R.C. 2933.83 was adduced. Appellant's conviction for robbery was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.