Skip to main content

State v. Almeyda

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3982

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle in violation of R.C. 2913.03(B) was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Contrary to appellant's claim otherwise, the weight of the evidence did not support the affirmative defense under R.C. 2913.03(C)(1), i.e., that appellant reasonably, albeit mistakenly, believed he was authorized to use the vehicle during the period of time in question. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.