State v. Almeyda
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3982
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle in violation of R.C. 2913.03(B) was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Contrary to appellant's claim otherwise, the weight of the evidence did not support the affirmative defense under R.C. 2913.03(C)(1), i.e., that appellant reasonably, albeit mistakenly, believed he was authorized to use the vehicle during the period of time in question. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-30· cited 20×
- State v. RoseOhio Supreme Court· 1992-05-06· cited 11×
- State v. VaughnOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-31· cited 4×
- State v. ChristonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-17· cited 2×
- State v. NorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.