State v. Vasquez

Citations

• 237 N.E.3d 885
• 2024 Ohio 860

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., the evidence reasonably supported finding that appellant fled after raping victim, so trial court did not err by giving consciousness-of-guilt instruction based on flight. Trial court's pattern jury instruction was not tailored to the facts of the case, making it potentially misleading to the jurors, but the error was harmless. Because the instruction allowed the jury to reach its own conclusion about the import of the flight evidence, it was neutral in its effect and not prejudicial.