Skip to main content
· 7/22/1991

United States v. Jesus Felix-Gutierrez

Citations

  • 940 F.2d 1200
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5808
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 8790
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15566
  • 1991 WL 131905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that accessory-after-the-fact liability can attach extraterritorially if the underlying statute was intended to reach extraterritorially, but international law jurisdictional limits still apply
  • concluding that the extraterritorial application of 18 U.S.C. § 3, which prohibits being an accessory 52 after the fact of a crime, depends upon the predicate offense
  • noting that congressional intent that penal statute apply extraterritorially may be express or implied
  • applying Bowman to accessory after the fact to the murder of a DEA agent in Mexico
  • applying territorial, protective, and passive personality principles “cumulatively” to find extraterritorial jurisdiction over a prosecution of a Mexican national for assisting in the kidnapping and murder of an American Drug Enforcement Agency agent in Mexico
  • “We have inferred extraterritorial application of conspiracy statutes on the basis of a finding that the underlying substantive statutes reach extraterritorial offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Nelson, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.