Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/26/2025
State v. Vargas
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4482
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress. The court correctly concluded that appellant's initial encounter with a police officer was consensual and that during the interaction the officer saw illegal drugs on appellant's person in plain view. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hanseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,923×
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
- Kaupp v. TexasSupreme Court· 2003-05-05· cited 414×
- Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-06-20· cited 296×
- State v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 219×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1994-04-20· cited 167×
- State v. HalczyszakOhio Supreme Court· 1986-08-13· cited 137×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2009-12-15· cited 136×
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 94×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.