Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/15/1982
State v. Valladares
Citations
- 639 P.2d 813
- 31 Wash. App. 63
- 1982 Wash. App. LEXIS 2437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant's withdrawal of motion to suppress evidence allegedly illegally seized waived his right to have question reviewed on appeal
- Although an issue of constitutional magnitude may be first raised on appeal pursuant to RAP 2.5(a)(3), that right may be waived or abandoned by withdrawing the motion.
- challenge to a warrantless search was deemed waived or abandoned where motion to suppress was withdrawn
- statement against interest even though portions were exculpatory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 341×
- State v. WWJ Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 201×
- State v. ParrisWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-24· cited 142×
- State v. ValladaresWashington Supreme Court· 1983-06-02· cited 112×
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 70×
- State v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-07· cited 57×
- State v. GatalskiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-07-26· cited 49×
- State v. SalasWashington Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 49×
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-06-06· cited 48×
- State v. StubsjoenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-08· cited 45×
- State v. TaricaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-10-01· cited 34×
- State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-10-15· cited 26×
- State v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-22· cited 22×
- State v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-16· cited 14×
- In Re Disability Proceeding Against DiamondstoneWashington Supreme Court· 2005-01-20· cited 13×
- In re the Disability Proceeding Against DiamondstoneWashington Supreme Court· 2005-01-20· cited 13×
- State v. P.B.T.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-26· cited 13×
- Henriksen v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-10-13· cited 12×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezFifth Circuit· 1978-11-20· cited 162×
- State v. KrollWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 152×
- United States v. Myron LiebermanSecond Circuit· 1980-12-16· cited 136×
- United States v. Claude Leander RileyEighth Circuit· 1981-09-08· cited 131×
- State v. LairWashington Supreme Court· 1981-06-18· cited 101×
- United States v. Robert Joseph SatterfieldNinth Circuit· 1978-03-22· cited 99×
- United States v. Luis Oscar Sarmiento-PerezFifth Circuit· 1981-01-09· cited 98×
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court· 1968-03-07· cited 87×
- United States v. Antonio John Palumbo, IIThird Circuit· 1981-03-13· cited 79×
- State v. LampshireWashington Supreme Court· 1968-11-21· cited 79×
- State v. BaxterWashington Supreme Court· 1966-04-21· cited 68×
- State v. GalloCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-18· cited 44×
- United States v. Edward GarrisSecond Circuit· 1980-02-25· cited 34×
- State v. RichardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-03-08· cited 22×
- State v. DardenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-10-26· cited 21×
- State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-10-26· cited 18×
- State v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-09-24· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.