Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/3/2018
State v. Valiente-Mendoza
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3090
Syllabus
Criminal. Trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress where encounter with law enforcement was consensual and later became supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity. Appellant, a native Spanish speaker, was properly provided with two Supreme Court certified interpreters.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 1,010×
- State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court· 2006-05-31· cited 413×
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-02· cited 348×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 2004-11-24· cited 299×
- State v. WereOhio Supreme Court· 2008-06-17· cited 275×
- State v. BrinkleyOhio Supreme Court· 2005-04-13· cited 180×
- State v. EmersonOhio Supreme Court· 2012-11-01· cited 85×
- State v. SteedOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-09· cited 16×
- State v. HillsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-03· cited 12×
- State v. GasparenoOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-14· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.