Washington Supreme Court· 9/9/2010

State v. Valencia

Citations

169 Wash. 2d 782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a condition subjecting a defendant to a search is ripe when “the State attempts to enforce [it] because [its] validity depends on the particular circumstances of the attempted enforcement.”
explaining that a condition subjecting a defendant to a search is ripe when “the State attempts to enforce [it] because [its] validity depends on the particular circumstances of the attempted enforcement.”
examining the plain language of a community custody condition to determine whether it provided sufficient notice to the offender
no further factual development is necessary when the condition at issue places immediate restriction on conduct without any action by the State
considering a facial vagueness challenge to \the condition as written\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Sanders, Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.