Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/25/2014
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 180 Wash. App. 318
- 327 P.3d 704
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking Internet-related community custody condition because “there [were] no findings suggesting any nexus between [the defendant’s] offense and any computer use or Internet use”
- remanding to the trial court to clarify the sentencing condition prohibiting contact with physically or mentally \vulnerable\ individuals
- striking Internet related community custody condition because \there [were] no findings 11 No. 72338-3-1/12 suggesting any nexus between [the defendant's] offense and any computer use or Internet use\
- Division Two of this court remanded and ordered the trial court to either clarify a term in the condition or strike the portion of the condition using that term
- Division Two of this court remanded and ordered the trial court to either clarify a term in the condition, or strike the portion of the condition using that term.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bjorgen, Johanson, Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court· 2011-02-10· cited 1,036×
- State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-03· cited 695×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 629×
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 511×
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 425×
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 405×
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court· 1990-08-23· cited 388×
- In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court· 2013-03-14· cited 316×
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court· 2010-09-09· cited 254×
- State v. MomahWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 239×
- State v. EasterlingWashington Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 167×
- State v. MacIolekWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-16· cited 115×
- State v. GrierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-07· cited 76×
- State v. O'CainCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-05-27· cited 56×
- In re the Personal Restraint of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-04· cited 48×
- In Re Personal Restraint Petition of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-04· cited 45×
- State v. BeskurtWashington Supreme Court· 2013-01-31· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.