Skip to main content

State v. Urbina

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 4254

Syllabus

The trial court's decision to deny defendant-appellant's request for a continuance did not violate defendant-appellant's right to due process. As the trial court's questioning of the State's witness did not evince bias or prejudice against defendant-appellant, the trial court did not violate defendant-appellant's right to due process. Defendant-appellant failed to establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.