State v. Urbina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the unpreserved issue of whether downloading constitutes duplication is a question of first impression and not plain error
• observing that the unpreserved issue of whether downloading constitutes duplication was a question of “first impression” and there- fore not plain error
• rejecting a similar plain error argument based, in part, on our observation that a trier of fact could infer that a user of a file-sharing software program would likely be sophisticated enough to understand its most basic functions
• trier of fact could infer that defendant understood the most basic sharing features of the file-sharing software that he had installed on his computer
• rejecting a similar scienter argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).