State v. Kimble
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 76
Syllabus
Manifest weight of the evidence; Denial of continuance; Motion to quash subpoena; Harmless error. The defendant-appellant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a mid-trial motion for a continuance, and while the trial court did err in granting the state's motion to quash a defense subpoena, such error was harmless.
Judges: Waldick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 737×
- State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 575×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2001-04-18· cited 492×
- State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-27· cited 84×
- State v. SowdersOhio Supreme Court· 1983-04-13· cited 63×
- State v. ShockeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-29· cited 15×
- State v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-02· cited 12×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-21· cited 4×
- State v. UrbinaOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.