Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/11/2012
State v. Urbina
Citations
- 278 P.3d 33
- 249 Or. App. 267
- 2012 WL 1202133
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 462
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the unpreserved issue of whether downloading constitutes duplication is a question of first impression and not plain error
- observing that the unpreserved issue of whether downloading constitutes duplication was a question of “first impression” and there- fore not plain error
- rejecting a similar plain error argument based, in part, on our observation that a trier of fact could infer that a user of a file-sharing software program would likely be sophisticated enough to understand its most basic functions
- trier of fact could infer that defendant understood the most basic sharing features of the file-sharing software that he had installed on his computer
- rejecting a similar scienter argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
- State v. BrayOregon Supreme Court· 2007-06-01· cited 64×
- State v. BargerOregon Supreme Court· 2011-01-06· cited 26×
- State v. Andrew William BetnarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-15· cited 14×
- State v. BargerOregon Supreme Court· 2011-04-21· cited 12×
- State v. RitchieOregon Supreme Court· 2011-01-06· cited 11×
- State v. InloesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24· cited 9×
- State v. Vargas-TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-06· cited 7×
- State v. Camarena-VelascoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-07-19· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.