Oregon Supreme Court· 1/6/2011
State v. Barger
Citations
- 247 P.3d 309
- 349 Or. 553
- 2011 Ore. LEXIS 3
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to “possessf] or control[]” an image depicting child pornography within the meaning of ORS 163.686 requires something more than viewing the images on a computer
- explaining that “none of the cases [from other jurisdictions] involves statutes that effectively announce that ‘viewing’ child pornography is not, by itself, unlawful”
- ‘‘navigating to a website and bringing the images that the site contains to a computer screen— are not acts that the legislature intended to crimi- nalize’’
- “[T]he word ‘possess’ encompasses two alternative ways of possessing property that this court traditionally has recognized: (1) physically controlling the property (‘actual’ possession) and (2
- despite evidence that the defendant viewed child pornography over the Internet, there was no evidence that the defendant knew or understood that the files were downloaded into a temporary Internet file cache
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Linder, Gillette
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. KentNew York Court of Appeals· 2012-05-08· cited 37×
- State v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-06· cited 19×
- State v. BarnthouseOregon Supreme Court· 2016-10-06· cited 16×
- State v. Carey-MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-06· cited 14×
- State v. TildenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-03· cited 14×
- State v. BargerOregon Supreme Court· 2011-04-21· cited 12×
- State v. RitchieOregon Supreme Court· 2011-01-06· cited 11×
- State v. ShifflettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-24· cited 10×
- State v. LinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 8×
- State v. BarnthouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-20· cited 8×
- State v. UrbinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-11· cited 5×
- State v. PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-21· cited 5×
- Hardin v. PopoffMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-29· cited 5×
- State v. CortesOregon Supreme Court· 2025-11-25· cited 4×
- State v. BallantyneCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2024-02-02· cited 3×
- State v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-05-04
- ISSAC WOODS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-01-20
- State v. Kenneth G.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2026-01-06
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-13
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- State v. OareOregon Supreme Court· 1968-04-17· cited 61×
- United States v. KainEighth Circuit· 2009-12-22· cited 57×
- State v. FriesOregon Supreme Court· 2008-05-30· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. DiodoroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-05-26· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. WhitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-12-12· cited 49×
- State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court· 2009-03-05· cited 40×
- Barton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-06-21· cited 33×
- State v. ConnallyOregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 32×
- People v. JOSEPHITISAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-08-19· cited 19×
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court· 1964-09-10· cited 18×
- State v. DanielsOregon Supreme Court· 2010-07-09· cited 14×
- State v. WellerOregon Supreme Court· 1972-10-09· cited 14×
- Worden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2009-05-22· cited 12×
- Shipp v. PattenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1906-05-22· cited 12×
- State v. RitchieOregon Supreme Court· 2011-01-06· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.