State v. Ulm
Citations
- 205 N.E.3d 19
- 2022 Ohio 4741
Syllabus
Appellant pleaded guilty to two counts of rape (under age 10/force), two counts of rape (under age 10), and two counts of gross sexual imposition (under age 13). Consistent with the parties' agreement, appellant was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 50 years to life, to be served concurrently with a 60-year prison sentence previously imposed in a federal case. Although the trial court only partially complied with the Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) maximum penalty advisement related to the registration and other requirements imposed by appellant's sexual offender designation, appellant does not assert, and the record does not reflect, that his plea decision would have been different if he had been provided a complete explanation of the sexual offender requirements. The trial court did not err by not merging Count II (rape of a child under 10) with Count III (rape of a child under 10 by force) the parties had agreed that the offenses would not merge. The record does not demonstrate ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Finally, the trial court did err by imposing post-release control on the rape counts. As to these counts, appellant was correctly sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after serving a required number of years. As such, appellant will be subject to life-time parole supervision if he is released from prison. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court so that the judgment entry may be amended to reflect parole supervision on the rape counts. (Donovan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.)
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-13· cited 406×
- State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court· 1980-12-23· cited 301×
- Hayward v. Summa Health System/Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 86×
- Wagner v. Roche LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-12· cited 74×
- State v. Miller (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-14· cited 71×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-08· cited 36×
- State v. EveretteOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 32×
- State v. Thompson, Jr.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-24· cited 20×
- State v. PerdueOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-11· cited 17×
- State v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-21· cited 15×
- State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-30· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.