Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/14/2023

State v. Tutt

Citations

2023 Ohio 2819

Syllabus

The hearing upon the appellate court's limited remand was limited to the advisement of the mandatory Reagan Tokes notifications. The unrelated arguments appellant now raises could have been addressed in his direct appeal and are barred by res judicata.

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Calista Ents., L.L.C. v. Oxford Bd. of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-12· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Saxon
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
State v. Griffin
Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-12-19· cited 48×
State v. Blankenburg
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-28· cited 24×
Daloia v. Franciscan Health Sys. of Cent. Ohio, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 17×
State v. Brown Suber
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-06· cited 11×
State v. Carter
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-28· cited 9×
State v. Tutt
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-19· cited 9×
State v. Pope
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-14· cited 9×
State v. Bonnell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-10· cited 6×
State v. McIntyre
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-13· cited 4×
Darden v. Fambrough
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-19· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.