State v. Tutt
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 96
Syllabus
Appellant is not entitled to have his guilty plea vacated for failure to comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) where the trial court corrected its overstatement of the maximum penalty appellant faced under the Reagan Tokes Act for his convictions to two counts of rape prior to sentencing, provided appellant with the opportunity to withdraw his plea, something appellant indicated through counsel that he did not wish to do, and where appellant failed to show any prejudice from the court's overstatement of the maximum sentence.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BloodworthOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-06· cited 9×
- State v. TiptonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-05· cited 7×
- State v. BroughtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-30· cited 5×
- State v. BondOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-16· cited 5×
- State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-07· cited 4×
- State v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-18· cited 3×
- State v. TuttOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-14· cited 1×
- State v. FrancisOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-25· cited 1×
- State v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-17· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.