Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/14/2022
State v. Pope
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 426
Syllabus
The trial court did not provide the defendant with the necessary notifications required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) regarding the indefinite nature of his sentence, which resulted in reversible error and the matter was remanded for resentencing on this limited issue.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GatesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-19· cited 17×
- State v. Abdus-SalaamOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-22· cited 6×
- State v. BoboOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-06· cited 4×
- State v. SavageOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-14· cited 4×
- State v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-19· cited 2×
- State v. TuttOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-14· cited 1×
- State v. BradleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-31· cited 1×
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-30
- State v. BoykinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-27
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. HodgkinOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-19· cited 68×
- State v. AlexanderOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-27· cited 28×
- State v. RobersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-18· cited 13×
- State v. PaulOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-10· cited 12×
- State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-31· cited 12×
- State v. Brown SuberOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-06· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.