Skip to main content

State v. Tucker

Citations

  • 10 Haw. App. 43
  • 861 P.2d 24
  • 1993 Haw. App. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the statement became “powerfully incriminating” in “the evidentiary context in which [they were] presented to the jury” and, thus, “should not have been admitted into evidence in the form presented to the jury”
  • omission of a parental duty is the equivalent of an act and when death results, the standard for determining the degree of homicide is identical
  • cert. granted and remanded, 74 Haw. 652, 857 P.2d 600, on remand 10 Haw.App. 73, 861 P.2d 37, recon. denied, 10 Haw.App. 94, 863 P.2d 989

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Watanabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.