Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 7/21/1993

State v. Tucker

Citations

861 P.2d 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the statement became “powerfully incriminating” in “the evidentiary context in which [they were] presented to the jury” and, thus, “should not have been admitted into evidence in the form presented to the jury”
omission of a parental duty is the equivalent of an act and when death results, the standard for determining the degree of homicide is identical
cert. granted and remanded, 74 Haw. 652, 857 P.2d 600, on remand 10 Haw.App. 73, 861 P.2d 37, recon. denied, 10 Haw.App. 94, 863 P.2d 989

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, C.J., Heen and Watanabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.