State v. Tucker
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 2066
Syllabus
GROSS SEXUAL IMPOSITION — SEXUAL CONTACT— PURPOSE: Defendant's conviction for gross sexual imposition was supported by sufficient evidence and not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, and a rational trier of fact could infer that defendant touched the victim's erogenous zone to achieve sexual gratification or arousal where the victim testified that she was intoxicated when defendant drove her home and locked her in his car before he groped and touched her inappropriately.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court· 1992-04-15· cited 801×
- State v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-23· cited 49×
- State v. BensonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-14· cited 12×
- State v. ArmsteadOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-10· cited 12×
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-02· cited 11×
- State v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-06· cited 9×
- State v. BeauchampOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-11· cited 7×
- State v. AlananiOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-04· cited 4×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.