State v. Beauchamp
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 738
Syllabus
SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE – CRIMINAL DAMAGING – NO-CONTACT ORDER – SENTENCING: Defendant's conviction for criminal damaging was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence where credible testimony established that defendant broke the back window, front windshield and headlights of the victim's vehicle. The trial court erred in imposing a no-contact order when the defendant was not placed on community control.
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-31· cited 7×
- State v. PatrickOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-23· cited 4×
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-25· cited 3×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-16· cited 1×
- State v. GroseOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-29
- State v. TuckerOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-03
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.